]

Selling Sunset: Mary Bonnet Reacts to Bre Tiesi, Chelsea Lazkani Drama

Trending 2 weeks ago

‘Selling Sunset’ Star Chelsea Lazkani Files for Divorce

Mary Bonnet is giving her assessment.

No, not connected 1 of her existent property properties—but connected nan play that unfolded connected play 8 of Selling Sunset after Bre Tiesi told Chelsea Lazkani about her husband Jeff Lazkani’s alleged infidelity.

“I deliberation Bre did nan correct thing,” Mary told E! News successful an exclusive interview. “If it were me, I would want personification to travel show me. I deliberation she handled it pinch grace. She was delicate astir it. They’ve had their beef successful nan past. Bre’s not nan benignant of personification that—if she wanted to beryllium rude, she'll beryllium rude. She'll laic it retired there. But I for illustration Bre a lot. She's conscionable a very consecutive shooter, and I respect that.”

Still, nan reality prima understands it was a reliable business for Chelsea.

“It's not an easy point for anybody to hear,” she continued, “and it's very communal for group to blasted different group because you don't want to blasted nan personification that really wounded you. So it's a communal point I deliberation that happens, but I don't deliberation it's Bre’s responsibility astatine all."

While Bre and Chelsea already had past feuds—thanks to Chelsea weighing successful connected Bre’s narration pinch Nick Cannon, dada to her 2-year-old boy Legendary Love—it seemed for illustration they had moved on.

“I consciousness for illustration we’ve put each our armor down,” Chelsea said earlier this season, “and we’re moving towards having a really nice, cohesive not only master narration but individual narration too.”

Courtesy of Netflix © 2024, Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Netflix

However, their move changed aft Bre’s friend Amanda Lynn told her a pal allegedly saw Chelsea’s hubby Jeff making retired pinch different female successful a edifice lobby, and Bre relayed this accusation to Chelsea during a filmed sit-down (E! News reached retired to Jeff’s lawyer and reps for some him and Chelsea aft nan allegations were revealed successful a season teaser but didn’t perceive back).

While it initially seemed for illustration nan costars remained connected bully terms, Chelsea past questioned Bre’s intentions for bringing up nan allegations connected camera and if she group up nan segment pinch Amanda. However, Bre insisted she wasn’t intentionally trying to peddle this drama.

“I f--king told Chelsea already,” Bre explained during a telephone telephone pinch Chelsea and their costars Chrishell Stause and Emma Hernan. “I’ve already told you guys. I don’t want to beryllium nan 1 f--king involved. I don’t want to beryllium nan 1 that has to travel retired and show her this s--t. This doesn’t look bully for me. It doesn’t activity me. It doesn’t consciousness bully for me, particularly aft nan truth that I’m trying to really person a narration pinch Chelsea.”

Courtesy of Netflix © 2024

Bre really claimed Chelsea knew astir nan cheating allegations earlier filming moreover started and that she had a speech pinch her off-camera.

"I told her months earlier we filmed," she noted to E! Sept. 26. "I told her earlier Amanda was moreover coming on, and I fto her cognize accumulation asked for this lunch.'"

However, Chelsea tells a different story.

Alleging Bre “didn’t person a storyline” this season, Chelsea told Jessie Woo in a Sept. 9 Instagram Live, “Bre made it very clear that she had thing connected me,” told production, “and that’s why they gave her nan segment pinch Amanda.”

After allegedly proceeding astir nan Amanda sit-down from Emma, Chelsea said she asked accumulation to group up a scene betwixt herself and Bre truthful she could perceive nan rumor from her straight earlier it dispersed immoderate further.  

"I said, 'This is gonna beryllium a storyline,'" she added. “So I said to production, ‘I want Bre to show me. The past point I want is for this s--t to spell astir to 10 different group astatine nan agency earlier it comes to me.’”

“I sat location and watched her beryllium a 'girl’s girl' and make retired for illustration she wanted to springiness maine nan heads-up for a segment that I f--king orchestrated,” Chelsea continued, “because I knew nan flip broadside could person been a batch uglier.” (E! News reached retired to Netflix for remark but has yet to perceive back).

As for really nan chatter played a domiciled successful her subsequent divorce, Chelsea insisted to Entertainment Tonight that nan rumor “has thing to do pinch nan deterioriation of my marriage.”

Meanwhile, Mary had her ain play pinch Chelsea this season. During nan show, Mary said she’d been asked by a societal media follower who was nan biggest pot-stirrer and picked Chelsea. Afterwards, she claimed, Chelsea sent her a “rude” and “inappropriate” text. Chelsea besides didn’t admit it erstwhile Mary had a speech pinch their bosses Brett and Jason Oppenheim astir group telling her Chelsea’s outfit wasn’t work-appropriate.

However, Mary suggests they’ve moved forward.

“For me, I consciousness that we squashed everything," she told E!. “She sent a matter astir something, we had an statement astir it, and past I didn't work together pinch her outfit—only successful a activity environment. Like, she could deterioration it out, she looks beautiful successful it, she's a beautiful woman. Just astatine work, erstwhile you're representing clients, I didn't deliberation it was appropriate. But again, work together to disagree.”

Courtesy of Netflix © 2024

Mary writes astir her emergence to reality stardom arsenic good arsenic her individual travel off-camera successful her caller memoir Selling Sunshine, which was released by HarperCollins Sept. 24. In nan book, she recalls nan words she received from Selling Sunset creator Adam DiVello when nan show first launched: “’I can’t usage what you don’t springiness me. So astatine nan extremity of nan day, what you opportunity and really you enactment is up to you.’”

Eight seasons later, Mary says this building is still valid.

“It’s perfectly true,” she told E!. “People effort to say, ‘Oh no, they’re utilizing this.’ I mean, they tin edit it wherever you don't get nan afloat picture. But if you opportunity aliases do something, you did it. You said it. It's correct there. So I deliberation sometimes things are taken retired of discourse slightly, but for nan astir part, it is what it is.”

For nan latest breaking news updates, click present to download nan E! News App

More
Source E! Online
E! Online